An Energy Overview
of Colombia
Courtesy of the U.S. Department
of Energy
Energy Summary [Oil, Natural
Gas, Coal, Renewables, Infrastructure, Electricity]
Energy Policy | Environmental
Activities | Privatization
Status | Economic Situation | Trade & Investment
General Information
The Republic of Colombia is the
fourth largest country in South America, with an
area about two times the size of Texas, and is bordered
by Venezuela to the east, Ecuador, Peru and Brazil
to the south, the Pacific Ocean to the west, Panama
to the northwest, and the Caribbean Sea to the north.
Colombia has a population of about 40 million
and an annual growth rate of approximately 1.6%.
There are 32 administrative regions (called 'departamentos')
in Colombia, plus the capital district which is its
own autonomous administrative region; these administrative
regions are shown in Figure 1. The capital city,
Bogotá, is located in the center of the country
and has a population of about 6 million. Colombia's
currency, the Colombian peso, has an exchange rate
(as of August 2002) of approximately 2,560 pesos
per U.S. dollar (i.e., one peso equals $.00039).
The nominal gross domestic product (GDP) for Colombia
in 1999 was an estimated $89 billion and the
GDP for the year 2000 was forecasted to be $91.3 billion.
Colombia is a member of the United Nations, the World
Trade Organization (WTO), the International Monetary
Fund (IMF), and the Colombian Foreign Trade Institute
(INCOMEX).
Figure 1: Administrative Regions
of Colombia
 |
DC - Distrito Capital
de Santa Fé de Bogotá
AMA - Amazonas
ANT - Antioquia
ARA - Arauca
ATL - Atlántico
BOL - Bolívar
BOY - Boyacá
CAL - Caldas
CAQ - Caquetá
CAS - Casanare
CAU - Cauca
CES - Cesar
COR - Córdoba
CUN - Cundinamarca
CHO - Chocó
GUA - Guainía
GUV - Guaviare
HUI - Huila
LAG - La Guajira
MAG - Magdalena
MET - Meta
NAR - Nariño
NSA - Norte de Santander
PUT - Putumayo
QUI - Quindío
RIS - Risaralda
SAP - San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina
SAN - Santander
SUC - Sucre
TOL - Tolima
VAL - Valle de Cauca
VAU - Vaupés
VID - Vichada |
Source: map courtesy of and copyright by FOTW
Flags of the World
Energy Policy
and Regulation
Colombia is a free-market economy
with major commercial and investment links to the
United States. Transition from a highly regulated
economic regime to an unrestricted access market
has been underway since 1990. During the 1980s, the
electricity generation sector for Colombia (as well
as for most other South American countries) was mired
in troubles, due in part to the inefficiency of some
state-owned generating companies and development
of huge generation projects (which resulted in large
cost and schedule overruns).
Beginning in 1990, the Colombian
government has introduced several new policies to
spur economic development and promote private enterprise.
In 1994, the Colombian government enacted laws that
provide the current framework for the electricity
sector. Law 142 established that the provision
of electricity, telecommunications, water, sewage,
and bottled gas distribution are essential public
services that may be provided by both public and
private entities. Law 143 sets out the following
principles for the electricity industry: efficiency,
quality, continuity, adaptability, neutrality, solidarity,
and equity. These principles are implemented by resolutions
promulgated by the Comision de Regulacion de Energia
y Gas (Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission or CREG),
and other governing bodies.
In May and June of 1999, the Colombian
Congress passed legislation to reform oil royalties,
and Empresa Colombiana de Petroleos (Ecopetrol),
the state industrial and commercial company responsible
for the petrochemicals industry, revised the terms
of its association contracts to further promote foreign
investment. In late August of 2000, the Colombian
government was formulating two new laws to make gas
exploration easier. One law would reduce the amount
of royalties that producers pay on gas, and the other
one would liberalize the price of gas, which is currently
regulated. The two laws hope to build a thriving
Colombian gas market, as well as spur more economic
development. A new Colombian mining code, Bill 269,
is currently undergoing debate and could be passed
by the end of 2000. The bill will increase Colombia's
competitiveness in the global mining industry by
providing tax incentives for exploration and production
activities.
The Ministry of Mines and Energy
is responsible for the overall policy making and
supervision of the electricity sector in Colombia.
It regulates generation, transmission, trading, interconnection,
and distribution, and approves generation and transmission
programs. The ministry delegates supervisory authority
over the electricity sector to a number of its agencies,
specifically the CREG, the Union of Mineral and Energy
Planning (UPME), and the National Energy Finance
Company.
Energy
Summary
Colombia possesses numerous fossil
fuel and natural resources. The country has productive
petroleum reserves, extensive coal reserves that
make it a global leader in coal exports, significant
but largely untapped natural gas reserves, and extensive
hydroelectric resources. A large amount of potentially
productive oil and natural gas areas remain unexplored.
An historical summary of Colombia?s total primary
energy production (TPEP) and consumption (TPEC) is
shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Colombia's TPEP and TPEC,
1990-2000
(in Quads)
|
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
TPEP |
1.93 |
1.87 |
1.90 |
1.99 |
2.01 |
2.41 |
2.61 |
2.85 |
3.07 |
3.21 |
3.09 |
TPEC |
0.89 |
0.97 |
0.98 |
1.07 |
1.10 |
1.12 |
1.18 |
1.29 |
1.25 |
1.18 |
1.18 |
note: 1 Quad = 1 quadrillion Btu
Source: DOE/EIA
Oil
Reserves, Exploration, Production,
and Consumption
Ecopetrol is attached to the Ministry of Mines and Energy and possesses legal
existence, administrative and decision-making autonomy, and its own, independent
capital. Ecopetrol is responsible for exploring, extracting, processing, transporting,
and marketing the hydrocarbon resources placed at its disposition. It implements
its activities under conditions of efficiency and social responsibility, in
order to balance its own development with the transfer of resources required
by the government. In 1999, in response to declining proven reserves, the former
president of Ecopetrol, Carlos Rodada, set a new production goal of 1.3 million
barrels per day by 2010. To reach this goal, estimates of exploration and development
expenditures are $6.0 billion and $9.0 billion, respectively. This
would require proven reserves to increase by about 5.7 billion barrels.
Current proven reserves are estimated to be 2.6 billion barrels. While
this may sound ambitious, a large percentage of the prospective zones have
not been explored.
Colombia is currently ranked fifth
in Latin America in crude oil production. Colombia
achieved oil self-sufficiency for the first time
in the early 1970s, only to require imports again
by 1976. Colombia continued with exploration activities
and achieved self-sufficiency again in 1986. Since
then, Colombia has had steady increases in petroleum
production throughout the years. In 1999, petroleum
production reached an all-time high of 831,000 barrels
per day (b/d). However, production was down to 710,000 b/d
as of June 2000, primarily due to increased bombings
of the major pipelines in Colombia by politically
motivated guerilla forces and decline in reserves
from the Cusiana-Cupiagua fields. An historical summary
of petroleum production and consumption in Colombia
is shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Petroleum Production
and Consumption in Colombia, 1990-2000
(in thousand b/d)
|
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Production (total)* |
450 |
427 |
441 |
463 |
457 |
595 |
633 |
663 |
743 |
826 |
705 |
Production
(Crude Oil only) |
440 |
419 |
433 |
456 |
450 |
585 |
623 |
652 |
733 |
816 |
691 |
Consumption |
197 |
205 |
230 |
240 |
244 |
251 |
278 |
287 |
289 |
277 |
272 |
* includes crude oil, natural gas plant
liquids, other liquids, and refinery processing
gain
Source: DOE/EIA
Because of the unavailability of
the pipelines to transport crude to shipping ports,
export volumes have decreased. In 1999, Colombia
exported over 450,000 barrels per day of crude oil
to the United States, valued at approximately $3.0 billion
(1999 dollars). However, as of August 2000, crude
oil exports to the United States have decreased to
326,000 barrels per day. It is estimated that Colombia
is incurring losses of more than $900,000 per day
in royalties, taxes, and state participation due
to the pipeline bombing campaign.
In addition to this recent rash
of bombing campaigns of the pipelines, Colombia is
at a critical crossroads in regards to petroleum
production. Despite increased production levels,
Colombia is at risk of becoming a net oil importer
by 2004 if new reserves are not discovered. Colombia's
reserves have decreased by 25% over the past six
years without sufficient exploration activity to
replenish. Normal production rates are expected to
decline beginning in 2001. The possibility of a decline
in production would have serious implications for
Colombia. The oil sector represents on a monetary
basis, more than 20% of Colombia?s exports and 4.5%
of gross domestic product (GDP).
Colombia has 18 sedimentary basins
that contain hydrocarbon potential, seven of which
have commercial production. The 18 basins cover 1,036,400
square kilometers with about 200,200 square kilometers
under actual exploration and production activity.
This means about 81% of this area is available for
contracting. The seven basins where current production
exists are the Upper, Middle, and Lower Magdalena
Valleys, Llanos Orientales, Putumayo, Catatumbo,
and Guajira basins. The hydrocarbon resource potential
is estimated to be 26 billion equivalent oil
barrels. The remaining eleven currently non-producing
basins are estimated to have potential of 11 billion
equivalent oil barrels.
Exploration in Colombia has traditionally
focused on areas with suitable infrastructure and
where there is sufficient geologic data so that investment
risk is reduced. Currently, exploration is addressing
areas with more complex geology. Greater investment
risk is involved in these activities; however, there
is also the possibility of major discoveries. The
major oilfields in Colombia are the Cusiana-Cupiagua
fields located in the Casanare department, and the
Cano Limon field located in the Arauca department.
BP-Amoco operates the Cusiana-Cupiagua fields on
behalf of a group of companies (Ecopetrol ? 50%,
BP-Amoco ? 19%, Total ? 19%, and Triton ? 12%). The
fields have combined reserves of 1.6 billion
barrels. Production from the Cusiana-Cupiagua fields
in 1999 averaged 434,000 b/d, which represented over
half of Colombia?s production. The crude oil from
that field is a light sweet crude with a 36.3° API
gravity and 0.26% sulfur content. BP has invested
about $3.0 billion in Colombia to date. Occidental
Petroleum operates the Cano-Limon field located in
Colombia?s eastern plains, and has a 35% working
interest in that field. The production level from
the Cano-Limon field in 1999 was 125,000 barrels
per day. The crude oil from this field has an API
gravity of 29.5°.
Government officials in Colombia
have reason for optimism of reaching their goal of
continuing to be an exporter of petroleum. In June
2000, Ecopetrol, Petrobras Colombia, and Nexen, Inc.
(formerly Canadian Occidental Petroleum) confirmed
discovery of the third largest oilfield of the last
20 years in Colombia: 280 million barrels of
high quality oil as minimum recoverable reserves
in the Guando oilfield. Preliminary estimates place
the amount of oil in place at 1.4 billion barrels
of 30° API gravity sweet crude. The new oilfield
was discovered in the Upper Magdalena Valley; it
could generate about 500 million dollars of
income and, in two and a half years, expand the economic
proficiency of the country. Nexen, Inc. has picked
up 100% interest in the Viallarica and Fusa blocks
east and south of Guando. Initial prospects for these
areas are also promising.
After a disappointing year in 1999
when only one contract for exploration was signed,
in mid-October 2000, Ecopetrol announced that it
had signed its 25th contract of the year, the most
in one year since 1985. This can be attributed to
newer laws that are promoting foreign interest in
Colombia as a petroleum resource. The new legislation
does not require companies that are engaged in the
hydrocarbon and mining sector to convert proceeds
from foreign sales into Colombian pesos -- they are
required to convert only enough to cover expenses.
Changes have also been made to Colombia?s association
contracts. The contracts, in use since 1974, are
contractual joint ventures rather than equity joint
ventures, and associate a company with Ecopetrol
to explore and develop reservoirs and distribute
production after royalty payments. One main change
was the reduction of Ecopetrol?s share of the field
once commerciality was declared, from 50% to 30%.
To further address Colombia?s problem
of declining reserves, Ecopetrol announced an offering
named Round 2000. This offering was a package of
13 units of blocks that were previously reserved
for Ecopetrol. The offering was broken down into
four categories:
Open acreage areas made up of
exploratory blocks, which are neither licensed
to private investors nor reserved for Ecopetrol,
-
Areas currently operated by
private investors, including blocks that are
in either exploration or production phases, which
account for nearly 90% of the country's production,
-
Ecopetrol-operated areas, including
blocks that have been reserved for Ecopetrol?s
own exploration efforts, blocks that have been
relinquished to Ecopetrol at the completion of
an associated contract, and production blocks
that Ecopetrol operates upon successful exploratory
efforts, and
-
Areas known to be prolific with
natural gas.
In 2001, Ecopetrol awarded the 13
projects to meet Colombia?s future goal of 1.3 million
barrels per day production in 2010. Five of the projects
are for exploration and the other eight are incremental
production projects. Project investment for the next
six years will be approximately $620 million.
Refineries
and Downstream Processing
Colombia has a total refining capacity of nearly 286,000 b/d. There are a total
of five refineries (as shown in Table 3) with the Barrancabermeja and
Cartagena refineries comprising nearly 99% of all capacity. Ecopetrol is responsible
for managing all aspects related to the petrochemicals industry, as well as
management of the two Barrancabermeja and Cartagena refineries.
Table 3: Colombia's Petroleum
Refineries
Refinery |
Location
(State) |
Capacity
(b/d) |
Barrancabermeja |
Santander |
205,000 |
Cartagena |
Bolivar |
75,000 |
Tibu |
Norte de Santander |
1,800 |
Orito |
Putumayo |
1,800 |
Empresa Colombiana
de Petroleos |
Apiay |
2,250 |
Total |
various |
285,850 |
Source: Ecopetrol
The Barrancabermeja and Cartagena
refineries are currently undergoing expansion and
modernization programs that would increase capacity
by 50,000 b/d at Barrancabermeja and 25,000 b/d
at Cartagena by 2002. These expansions would increase
installed capacity to over 355,000 b/d.
Colombia's refineries satisfy a
considerable portion of national demand for petroleum
products with its own production. The output of Colombia?s
refined petroleum products is shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Output of Refined Petroleum
Products in Colombia in 1998
Fuel |
Production Rate
(b/d) |
Percent
of Total |
Motor Gasoline |
107,000 |
33.1 |
Distillate Fuel Oil |
64,000 |
19.8 |
Residual Fuel Oil |
55,000 |
17.0 |
Liquefied Petroleum Gases |
21,000 |
6.5 |
Jet Fuel |
20,000 |
6.2 |
Kerosene |
3,000 |
0.9 |
Other |
53,000 |
16.4 |
Total |
323,000 |
100.0 |
Refinery Fuel and Loss |
12,000 |
|
note: total may not add to 100% due to rounding
Source: DOE/EIA
Natural Gas
Colombia has proven natural gas reserves that are estimated to range from 7 trillion
cubic feet (TCF) to 8 TCF. Potential reserves are estimated at 70 TCF.
Colombia produced and consumed 250 billion cubic feet (BCF) of dry natural
gas in 1998. Colombia's natural gas resources are located mainly in the Departments
of Casanare in east-central Colombia and Guajira in northern Colombia. Most
of the production occurred offshore in the Guajira region. An historical summary
of natural gas production and consumption in Colombia is shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Natural Gas Production
and Consumption in Colombia, 1990-2000
(in TCF)
|
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Production |
0.15 |
0.16 |
0.15 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.17 |
0.21 |
0.22 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
Consumption |
0.151 |
0.155 |
0.151 |
0.157 |
0.162 |
0.161 |
0.167 |
0.211 |
0.221 |
0.183 |
0.201 |
Source: DOE/EIA
There are three major government
organizations that play a role in the natural gas
industry in Colombia. Ecopetrol manages and regulates
all oil and gas exploration and exploitation activities.
The CREG regulates the transportation and distribution
of electric power and gas and adjusts policies and
procedures by which these services can reach the
consumers and allow market competition between providers.
Finally, Empresa Colombiana de Gas (Ecogas), under
the Ministry of Mines and Energy, is responsible
for gas transport, transport infrastructure, and
providing producers and consumers with equal access
to transport capacity. Ecopetrol previously managed
all aspects of gas transport. However, in 1997, the
Colombian Congress wanted to separate the transportation
sector from Ecopetrol?s exploration and production
activities. Therefore, in 1997, Ecogas was formed
to manage the gas transportation sector.
Recent increases in natural gas
prices have attracted investors to Colombia?s Caribbean
coast in search of natural gas. Earlier this year,
Millennium Energy, Inc. and Mera Petroleums Inc.
signed an agreement with Ecopetrol to explore for
natural gas in the Guajira Department. The concession
for these two companies may possess as much as 2 TCF
of natural gas in place. Also, a steel plant that
would use natural gas is being planned for construction
in this region. The steel plant project investment
is estimated to be $1.8 billion. Colombia is
in talks with at least one firm interested in building
a natural gas pipeline to Venezuela's Lake Maracaibo
for reinjection into declining oilfields. The Colombian
government has also been promoting the use of natural
gas to its citizens as a low-cost alternative energy
source (the cost of natural gas as an energy source
is only one-fifth of that of electricity in Colombia).
Distribution companies in Colombia have made considerable
progress in covering the main cities, reaching 1.4 million
residential users in 1998 as compared to 931,000
in 1995.
Coal
Colombia has proven recoverable coal reserves of 7.44 billion short tons.
Recoverable anthracite and bituminous make-up over 94% of these total reserves.
The majority of coal reserves are found in the Guajira (Cerrejon) peninsula
of northern Colombia and in the Cesar department (state). The Guajira peninsula
is located along the Atlantic coast and is home to the Cerrejon Zona Norte
mine. This is the largest coal mining operation in Latin America, possessing
over a billion short tons of reserves. The reserves found here are a tertiary,
low-ash, low-sulfur non-caking bituminous coal.
Colombia exports 84% of its total
coal production, and coal ranks third in exports
from Colombia. Colombia currently ranks first in
Latin America and seventh globally in the amount
of coal that it exports. Colombia consistently has
been the leader in coal production for Central and
South America. In 1997, the United States imported
about 10% of the coal production in Colombia. The
coal industry in Colombia is aggressively seeking
to expand its current exports within 10 years to
over 70 million short tons. This would place
it third in the world in coal exports if current
production levels in other nations remain constant.
An historical summary of coal production and consumption
in Colombia is shown in Table 6.
Table 6: Coal Production and Consumption
in Colombia, 1987-99
(in millions of short tons)
|
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Production
Anthracite
Bituminous
Lignite |
22.56
n/a
22.56
n/a |
22.04
n/a
22.04
n/a |
24.15
n/a
24.15
n/a |
23.39
n/a
23.39
n/a |
24.98
n/a
24.98
n/a |
28.37
n/a
28.37
n/a |
33.14
n/a
33.14
n/a |
35.93
n/a
35.93
n/a |
37.20
n/a
37.20
n/a |
36.11
n/a
36.11
n/a |
42.04
n/a
42.04
n/a |
Consumption |
3.04 |
5.51 |
6.18 |
6.35 |
6.07 |
5.05 |
5.27 |
5.56 |
5.67 |
4.38 |
4.71 |
n/a - not applicable
Source: DOE/EIA
Until mid-1999 the Colombian government
managed the coal sector, although the mines were
private with the exception of the Cerrejon Zona Norte
mine. The government owned 50% of this mine through
Carbones de Colombia (Carbocol), and Intercor, a
subsidiary of Exxon Mobile, owns the other 50%. Originally,
this contract was set to expire in 2008; however,
the operating license has been extended for another
25 years until 2033. In July 2000, the Cerrejon Zona
Norte mine complex completed an infrastructure expansion
project that would increase Colombian coal exports
by 4.4 million short tons annually from its
current range of 15 to 18.5 million short tons.
Carbones del Cerrejon (CdelC), the Anglo American
plc, Billiton plc, Glencore International AG consortium,
provided three quarters of the $42 million investment.
The North Cerrejon Association, the Exxon Mobile-Carbocol
joint venture, provided the remaining funds.
In its continuing efforts to attract
foreign investment, in February 2000 Colombia solicited
bids for the government's 50% share of the Cerrejon
Zona Norte mine operation. In September 2000, the
equally-aligned CdelC consortium had successfully
bid for the government?s share of the mining operation.
The consortium submitted a bid of approximately $384 million,
subject to certain adjustments at closing. The consortium
thus becomes a 50:50 partner with Intercor. In addition
to this new purchase, the consortium also has access
to over 2 billion short tons of thermal coal
resources in Cerrejon Central and Cerrejon South.
One of the other major coalmines
is the Pribbenow Mine, located near La Loma in the
Cesar department, which is operated by the U.S.-based
company Drummond Ltd. The mine has estimated reserves
in excess of 534 million short tons of high
Btu, low-ash, low sulfur thermal coal. The company?s
contract with the government-owned Colombian Mining
Company (Minercol) runs through 2019. Drummond is
expected to increase its cumulative capital investment
in the coal industry in Colombia to $1 billion.
This additional expenditure would increase its output
from 6 million short tons to 12 million
short tons annually by the end of the year.
Hydroelectric
and Other Renewable Energy
The Andes Mountains, rich in water resources, lends itself to hydroelectric
power and its important role in Colombia?s energy mix. More than 60% of Colombia's
net electricity power generation is from hydroelectric sources; in 1998, more
than 31 billion kWh were generated. As a result, Colombia accounts for
approximately 6% of the hydroelectric power generation for Central and South
America. More than half of the new electrical capacity planned or under construction
in Colombia between 2001-07 will be hydroelectric. One of the largest hydroelectric
projects is the Nechi project. The $606 million Nechi hydroelectric project,
being planned by the Medellin Public Utilities Company (Empresas Publicas de
Medellin, EPM), will have 645 megawatts (MWe) of capacity with an average nominal
generation of 3,712 gigawatt-hours (GWh) per year.
Other forms of renewable energy
use are virtually nonexistent in Colombia. However,
some Colombian companies are exploring the development
of renewable energy sources. EPM, supported by a
German technical cooperation agency, will begin a
two-year feasibility study in 2001 to evaluate the
possibility of generating electricity from wind in
the north Guajira department. EPM will install two
wind-measuring stations, in addition to the one already
in place, to determine the electricity generating
potential. After analyzing the data, EPM will decide
whether to launch a full-scale 24.7 MWe wind
generation plant at an investment of $24 million.
Colombia has also performed research on generating
electricity from ocean waves near the port of Buenaventura.
Energy
Infrastructure
Electricity Transmission
The Colombian National Transmission System (STN) provides a viable means of
transaction between electricity generators and traders. The transmission service
is a natural monopoly that is regulated by the CREG. There are 11 companies
in charge of electricity transmission in Colombia; the largest of these is
Interconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P. (ISA), which has partial ownership of more
than 74.2% of the STN network. ISA also owns 65% of the transmission company
Transelca, a company whose assets amount to 9.7% of the STN. ISA's role as
a transmission company evolved out of Laws 142 and 143 in 1994. Before this
legislation, ISA was a main generator of electricity, supplying over 30% of
the country?s total consumption.
ISA is the only energy transporter
in Colombia with national coverage. ISA owns and
operates 100% of the 500 kilovolt (kV) lines and
substations in the STN, and 67.4% of the 230 kV
transmission lines and 43.6% of the substations in
the system. ISA's transmission system consists of
1,070 kilometers of 500 kV lines and approximately
6,836 kilometers of 220/230 kV lines. The transmission
system is also interconnected to Ecuador and Venezuela;
however, this portion of the system has relatively
little volume at present. Colombia is expected to
increase its interconnected capacity with Ecuador,
with the majority of this interconnected capacity
expected to be used for sales to electricity purchasers
in Ecuador. ISA also operates the National Dispatch
Center (CND) and the Wholesale Energy Market (MEM).
ISA has been very aggressive in
expanding its transmission network. It has invested
more than $600 million to expand its transmission
network in order to establish a base network in the
STN since 1997. These investments included 560 kilometers
of 230 kV lines that were incorporated into
the network, 378 kilometers of 500 kV lines,
six 230 kV substations, and 1,428 MegaWatt Ampere
(MVA) transformation capacity. ISA had also bid successfully
in 1999 on two competitive-bidding expansion projects
presented by the UPME. The first project is a 230 kV-226
kilometer long transmission line from Primavera to
Guatiguara to Tasajero and the 230 kV-86 kilometer
long Sabanalarga-Cartagena transmission line. The
total investment for these two projects is estimated
to be $36 million. A new substation built by
ISA that connects a hydrogenerator with the southwestern
region of the country was expected to begin operations
in 2000.
Oil and Gas
Pipelines
Colombia possesses an extensive network of oil and gas pipelines linking production
areas to the main refineries and to shipping ports. The pipeline transportation
grid measures 11,859 kilometers. Ecopetrol is the owner of 6,881 kilometers
of pipelines, consisting of 2,527 kilometers of multi-pipeline to transport
fuels, 1,751 kilometers of oil pipelines for crude transport, 378 kilometers
of propane pipelines for the transportation of LPG, 663 kilometers of fuel
oil pipelines for fuel oil, 1,001 kilometers of gas pipelines for natural gas,
and 561 kilometers that are being converted for natural gas service. The most
important oil pipelines are the 774-kilometer Cano Limon-Covenas, the Alto
Magdalena, the 481-kilometer Colombia Oil Pipeline, the Transandino from Ecuador
to Tumaco, and the Oleoducto Central S.A. (Ocensa). Capacity-wise, the Ocensa
and Cano Limon-Covenas pipelines are the largest with 550,000 and 240,000 b/d,
respectively.
The major natural gas pipelines
are the 340-kilometer Mariquita to Cali (TransGas
Occidente), the 575-kilometer Ballena to Barrancabermeja,
and the 780-kilometer Barrancabermeja to Neiva to
Bogota (Centro Oriente). Expansion plans are in development
for future natural gas pipelines that will stretch
from Ecuador to Panama. In late 1999 Colombian officials
announced support for a Colombian-driven regional
natural gas grid to extend into Ecuador and Panama,
and eventually other Central American countries.
The purpose of the pipeline is to spur investment
in developing Colombia?s natural gas resources. The
Colombia to Panama pipeline is a planned 18-inch
diameter line that would be 592 kilometers long and
run from the Colombian port of Cartagena to Colon,
Panama. This pipeline project is estimated to require
an investment of $300 million. The pipeline
would initially transport 70 million cubic feet
(MCF) per day, with expansion to 140 MCF per
day possible in five or six years. The gas would
initially come from Texaco's fields in the Guajira
region, where it is currently being reinjected to
boost crude output. The gas would be used to generate
power in Enron?s Bahia Las Minas thermoelectric power
plant in Panama.
Railroads
and Port Facilities
Empresa Colombiana de Vias Ferreas (Ferrovias), the Colombian National Railroad
Company, provides administration, maintenance, upgrading, and control of the
railway system. Of the 3,154 kilometers that were in existence in 1961, only
2,000 kilometers are currently in service. The remainder have been lost primarily
due to lack of maintenance of the rails, bridges, and stations. The most important
line of the system is the Bogota to Santa Marta line. This line connects the
main internal production and consumption centers with the Caribbean Sea ports
and allows the mobilization for the exportation of products such as coffee,
oil by-products, paper, iron, and coal. Within this line, the La Loma to Santa
Marta section is fundamental due to its terminal position, as well as the large
volume of coal that is moved from the Drummond Pribbenow Mine in the department
of Cesar. The other major railroad line is the Cerrejon railroad, which carries
coal from the mine to Puerto Bolivar. The primary users of this line are the
CdelC-Intercor association and other mine operators in the southern part of
the Guajira department.
It is currently estimated that only
10% of the capacity of the railroad is utilized.
To recover the railway system, the Colombian government
and Ferrovias committed to assembling a concession
program to attract the private sector into rehabilitating,
maintaining, and controlling the operations of the
railway system. Two concessions were offered: the
Atlantic System and the Pacific System. The Atlantic
network was conceded to Fenosa S.A. Rehabilitation
of the Atlantic network is estimated to cost $205 million.
The Pacific network was conceded to Concesionaria
de la Red del Pacifico. The Colombian government
has committed to contribute funds for the first five
years of both concessions.
Colombia has major ports located
along the Caribbean Sea at Covenas, Barranquilla,
Cartagena, and Santa Marta. Major ports along the
Pacific Ocean are Buenaventura and Tumaco. The port
in Covenas ships Colombian crudes to the Gulf and
East Coasts of the United States. The port in Tumaco
ships to the U.S. West Coast. Drummond Ltd., a U.S.-based
coal firm, owns a port along the Caribbean Sea that
it uses to ship coal from Colombia. Plans are in
development to construct additional ports along the
Caribbean Sea for coal export. One plan is being
developed by a number of operators and producers
in the Cesar department of Colombia, and is being
led by Prodeco, a local subsidiary of Glencore. The
port location would be in the vicinity of Santa Marta
and is designed to handle 11 million short tons
in its initial stages, increasing to a minimum of
16.5 million short tons. Initial investment
would be $65 million, increasing by at least
$100 million for a handling capacity of 16.5 million
short tons.
The ambitious plans for coal ports
mirror the expectations that Colombian coal producers
have with regard to increased exports. Assuming that
the project meets approval, design specifications
will be finalized in 2001 and the port will commence
operations at the end of 2003. The second planned
port has received all the necessary licenses from
regulatory authorities. However, the construction
phase has not been initiated because of rumored reports
that the project has encountered financial difficulties.
The project would construct a deep-water port located
in Barranquilla and would handle up to 16.5 million
short tons.
The energy infrastructure of Colombia
is consistently under attack by guerrilla forces.
One of the principal targets has been the Cano Limon-Covenas
oil pipeline. This line is extremely vulnerable to
attacks because it runs mostly above ground in sparsely
populated areas with high rebel presence. As of mid-September
2000, the line had been out of service for 117 days
this year because of 62 bomb attacks. ISA?s electric
transmission system has also been the target of numerous
attacks since late 1999. A guerrilla forces bombing
campaign has destroyed some 400 transmission towers
and has caused repeated power outages in many parts
of the country. However, the built-in redundancy
of ISA?s transmission system prevented conditions
from becoming much worse than what they could have
been. More recently, but to a lesser degree, the
rail lines used to transport coal from the Drummond
coal mines in the Cesar department have been attacked.
Two recent attacks have derailed coal shipments from
the mines.
Electricity
Installed Capacity
Colombia presently has an installed electricity generation capacity of 14,614
megawatts (MWe). Hydroelectric generation capacity comprises over 55% of the
total capacity with thermal sources making up the remainder. An historical
summary of electricity generation capacity in Colombia is shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Installed Electricity
Generation Capacity in Colombia, 1990-2000
(in thousands of MWe)
|
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Hydroelectric |
6.67 |
6.61 |
6.71 |
6.79 |
7.70 |
7.90 |
7.88 |
8.06 |
8.14 |
8.20 |
8.57 |
Nuclear |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Geothermal/Solar/
Wind/Biomass |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Conventional Thermal |
2.12 |
2.24 |
2.89 |
4.23 |
4.49 |
4.76 |
4.77 |
5.46 |
6.47 |
4.62 |
4.65 |
Total Capacity |
8.79 |
8.85 |
9.60 |
11.02 |
12.19 |
12.66 |
12.65 |
13.51 |
14.61 |
12.82 |
13.22 |
n/a - not applicable
note: components may not add to total due to rounding
Source: DOE/EIA
Severe droughts in recent years
have caused power shortages and resulting forced
rationing. As a result, Colombia has encouraged development
of more non-hydroelectric electricity generation
capacity, with a goal of at least 20% shares for
both coal-fueled and gas-fueled power generation.
Colombia is planning to increase its thermal generation
capacity to 50% of its total capacity by 2010. Table 8
shows Colombia?s short-term electrical generation
expansion plan.
Table 8: Colombia's Electrical
Generation Expansion Plan, 2000?02
(Status as of August 2000)
Project |
Resource |
No. of
Units |
Unit
Capacity
(MWe) |
Total
Capacity
(MWe) |
Projected
Operational
Date |
Termocandelaria |
Natural Gas |
2 |
150 |
300 |
July 2000 |
Termocentro C.C. |
Natural Gas |
1 |
100 |
100 |
November 2000 |
Termosierra C.C. |
Natural Gas |
1 |
179 |
179 |
December 2000 |
T. Cesar |
Coal |
1 |
300 |
300 |
indefinite |
Urra I |
Hydroelectric |
4 |
85 |
340 |
June 2000 |
Porce II |
Hydroelectric |
3 |
131 |
393 |
July 2001 |
Miel I |
Hydroelectric |
3 |
125 |
375 |
July 2002 |
Rio Pedras |
Hydroelectric |
2 |
9.7 |
19.4 |
March 2000 |
Sonson II |
Hydroelectric |
1 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
March 2000 |
Pajarito |
Hydroelectric |
1 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
September 1999 |
Dolores |
Hydroelectric |
1 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
May 2000 |
Source: Interconexion Electrica S.A. ESP
Generation
and Consumption
The growth of electricity demand in Colombia is expected to be about 6% per
year for about the next decade. Hydroelectric is responsible for approximately
70% of the net generation of electric power in Colombia. The remaining amount
is primarily from thermal sources with a small fraction from renewables. With
the exception of the drought-ridden year of 1992, electricity demand in Colombia
has grown steadily since 1989. An historical summary of electricity production
and consumption in Colombia is shown in Table 9.
Table 9: Electricity Generation
and Consumption in Colombia, 1990-2000
(in billion kWh)
|
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Net Generation
hydroelectric
nuclear
geo/solar/wind/biomass
conventional thermal |
35.6
27.2
n/a
0.2
8.1 |
36.3
27.2
n/a
0.2
8.9 |
33.1
22.2
n/a
0.3
10.6 |
37.8
27.7
n/a
0.3
9.8 |
41.0
32.0
n/a
0.3
8.8 |
44.6
33.9
n/a
0.4
10.3 |
42.7
34.3
n/a
0.5
7.9 |
44.3
30.9
n/a
0.5
12.9 |
45.3
31.2
n/a
0.6
13.6 |
43.4
33.2
n/a
0.5
9.7 |
43.3
31.7
n/a
0.4
11.2 |
Net Consumption |
33.3 |
34.0 |
31.1 |
35.4 |
38.5 |
41.8 |
39.9 |
41.3 |
42.2 |
40.4 |
40.3 |
Imports |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Exports |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
generation components may not add to total
due to rounding
Source: DOE/EIA
Industry
Overview
The largest electricity generators in Colombia are Emgesa (in the Bogota region),
which owns over 2,500 MWe of capacity, and Empresa Publicas de Medellin,
which owns about 1,400 MWe of capacity. Combined, these two companies
serve about 40% of the country's electricity customers.
The Colombian government has created
a plan to supply additional electricity via its Electrical
Expansion Plan. Goals of this plan are to: (1) increase
electricity generation to meet growing demand; (2)
increase private investments to improve the regulatory
structure; (3) allow for more flexible electric utility
prices by improving the tariff structure and taking
into account varying income levels; and (4) allow
privatization of some state-owned electric power
plants.
The Cauca Valley of southern Colombia
is an example of privatization in the energy market.
At the Cauca Valley, the government has developed
an energy expansion plan to facilitate adequate electricity
generation, transmission, and distribution from 1995
to 2004. The plan calls for installation of additional
thermal power generation in the southern portion
of the country with implementation by the private
sector. Empresa de Energia del Pacifico (EPSA) provides
utility services in the Cauca Valley region. This
autonomous entity of the government solicited bids
for a 21-year power purchase agreement for up to
160 MWe of generating capacity. KMR Power Corporation
and Marubeni Corporation won the contract and they
plan to develop, construct, operate and own a 200 MWe
combined cycle gas-fired plant, where excess capacity
can be sold to third parties under long-term contracts
and on the relatively new spot market.
Environmental
Activities
Colombia is internationally recognized
as a country with high biological diversity -- approximately
10% of the world's biodiversity is located in Colombia.
The Colombian Ministry of the Environment strives
to maintain the country's natural and biological
resources while allowing sustained economic development.
Therefore, the ministry is greatly concerned about
the environmental impacts from oil and gas exploration
and production, the mining industry's activities,
and the development of hydroelectric resources.
Colombia?s experience with economic
and financial instruments for sustainable development
dates back to 1959, when the country's first environmental
and development authorities were created. These authorities
were primarily compensatory financial instruments.
They sought compensation for environmental damage
associated with the use of different natural resources,
but were not designed to and did not modify the behavior
of the deteriorating or polluting agents. Some of
these financial instruments included water and forest
user charges, air and water effluent charges, transfers
from the electric power sector for watershed conservation,
and royalty transfers to regional environmental authorities.
The common denominator for all of these instruments
is that they were not part of an integral strategy
to attain specific environmental goals.
Colombia was one of the first Latin
American countries to implement legislation requiring
environmental impact assessments (EIAs). The first
of these programs was established in 1974 under Law 2811.
INDERENA, the first Colombian environmental protection
agency, was responsible for administering the EIA
requirements. The law required developers to prepare
impact statements and environmental and ecological
studies as a step to obtain environmental licenses.
The purpose of licensing was to prepare an environmental
plan that showcased activities aimed at mitigating
environmental impact.
Between 1991 and 1993, Colombia's
Department of Natural Planning appraised the effectiveness
of the EIA, and found that the existing regulations
gave government officials too much discretion over
the manner in which EIAs were conducted. Following
the appraisal in 1993, the Colombian Congress phased
out INDERENA and created the Ministry of the Environment
through Law 99. The Ministry of the Environment
is now Colombia?s highest environmental authority.
Law 99 established a system of shared responsibility
for EIAs. Law 99 requires an environmental license
for the execution of projects and the establishment
of industries or development activities that may
cause natural resource or environmental damage. By
1997 the environmental license became the main regulatory
mechanism in Colombia.
The primary cause of environmental
damage to habitats in Colombia is by guerrilla terrorist
attacks on oil and gas pipelines and, to a lesser
extent, on electric transmission towers. A 1998 report
by the Colombian Ministry of the Environment showed
that oil spills, primarily from the heavily bombarded
Cano Limon-Covenas pipeline, have caused severe damage
to some of the country's rivers and wetlands, wildlife,
and farmland. The bombing campaigns over the last
ten years have resulted in the spilling into watercourses
of more oil than that which was spilled in the Exxon
Valdez incident.
Because Colombia possesses abundant
fossil fuel resources, the majority of carbon emissions
are from consumption and flaring of these fuels.
From 1989 to 1998, Colombia?s carbon dioxide emissions
from fossil fuel consumption have increased by nearly
40%. Petroleum consumption comprised over 61% of
these emissions in 1998, with natural gas and coal
approximately equally responsible for the remainder.
An historical summary of CO2 emissions
from fossil fuel use in Colombia is shown in Table 10.
Table 10: Fossil Fuel-related
Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Colombia, 1990-2000
(in millions of tonnes of carbon)
Component |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
CO2 from coal |
1.75 |
3.18 |
3.59 |
3.69 |
3.20 |
2.66 |
2.77 |
3.39 |
3.46 |
2.67 |
2.88 |
CO2 from natural
gas |
2.11 |
2.16 |
2.26 |
2.19 |
2.26 |
2.35 |
2.45 |
3.04 |
3.21 |
2.71 |
2.91 |
CO2 from petroleum |
7.39 |
7.64 |
8.64 |
9.02 |
9.08 |
9.58 |
10.14 |
10.53 |
10.73 |
10.22 |
10.02 |
Total CO2
from all
fossil fuels |
11.25 |
12.98 |
14.48 |
14.90 |
14.55 |
14.59 |
15.37 |
16.97 |
17.40 |
15.60 |
15.81 |
note: yearly components may not add to total
due to rounding
Source: DOE/EIA
To curtail its increasing carbon
dioxide emissions and reduce global warming, Colombia
is a party in the Kyoto Protocol. The Colombian government
supports the use of proposed flexible mechanisms
(such as carbon sinks, emissions trading, etc.) to
meet the Protocol?s goals.
Privatization
and Deregulation Status
Colombia has a free market economy
with major commercial and investment links to the
U.S. Transition from a highly regulated economic
regime to an unrestricted access market has been
underway since 1990. The U.S. is Colombia's largest
trading partner, and the U.S. has been the largest
individual country investor in Colombia.
The Colombian economy was opened
to foreign competition in 1991. Foreign investment
legislation was revised in 1995 to facilitate joint
ventures and other forms of investment. Joint ventures
and licensing agreements have become more important
recently as businesses strive to be more competitive.
The administration of Colombian
President Andres Pastrana has continued to support
Colombia's "apertura" (economic liberalization) begun
in 1990-1991 under former President Gaviria and continued
to a lesser degree by former President Samper. Privatization
projects in Colombia must receive congressional approval,
which can delay the process. Currently, government
officials are holding back on some sales due to political
pressure by labor unions and activist groups that
are demanding that state-owned assets not be "given
away."
The mid- to late-1990s have seen
the privatization and concession of many Colombian
seaports, airports, highways, energy projects, and
telecommunications institutions. Colombia?s natural
gas companies Promigas and Gas Natural have been
privatized. Since 1994, Colombia has privatized several
of its electricity generating companies to foreign
companies such as Chile?s Endesa and Gener, U.S.-based
Houston Industries, and, most recently, the sale
of two of three natural gas-fired power plants located
in Cartagena from privately-held KMR Power Corporation
to AES. As previously mentioned, the government is
currently liquidating its 50% holding in the Cerrejon
Zona Norte coal mine.
Another large and important divestiture
is the government's 76% holding in electricity generator
ISAgen. Originally scheduled to be privatized in
June 2000, the sale of the government?s share of
ISAgen has been delayed until June 2001 because of
legal challenges. As of early September 2000, four
companies had prequalified to participate in the
Isagen auction: Colombia's EPM, Enron, AES Corporation,
and Union Fenosa. The minimum price for the stake
in ISAgen has been set at $365 million.
In 1999, the IMF approved a three-year
credit of $2.7 billion for Colombia. The purpose
of this was to support the government's economic
reform program for 1999-2002. Colombia is expecting
to complete the privatization of several state-owned
banks over the next several months.
In December 1998, the Inter-American
Development Bank announced the approval of a $350 million
loan to Colombia to consolidate modernization of
the electric power sector. The resources will back
a reform program by the government to consolidate
a development model for the electric power industry
based on competition and private sector participation.
A solidarity fund will be put into operation in the
electricity and gas sectors to assist low-income
groups while at the same time eliminating company
deficits generated by subsidies. The program will
support actions to consolidate the independence of
the regulatory agency, and undertake policy design
and implementation to provide electricity to rural
areas not on the service grid. The program will promote
private sector participation in electricity distribution
companies at the national level, increasing revenues
from privatization, bringing in new capital along
with management expertise, and de-linking these companies
from the national budget.
Economic
Situation
Colombia is America's 4th largest
export market in Central and South America after
Mexico, Brazil, and Venezuela (which is almost equal
with Colombia), and ahead of Chile and Argentina.
Globally, Colombia ranks 25th as a market for U.S.
products. Proximity and the established presence
of U.S. Products and investments in the market contribute
to the continued success of U.S. companies in Colombia.
Despite the recent recession that
affected Colombia in 1998 and 1999, the Colombian
economy has been one of the most stable in all of
Latin America. Gross domestic product (GDP) and inflation
figures for the past sixty years point to an excellent
economic performance within the context of Latin
America, and also as a developing country. Colombia's
economic growth has consistently been higher than
the Latin American average. Colombia's inflation
rate has also been historically low compared to other
Latin American countries. In the 1990s, the average
inflation rate in Latin American ranged between 200
and 300%, while Colombia's inflation rate remained
below 30%. Recognized for its economic stability,
Colombia, along with Chile, became the first two
Latin American countries to receive investment grade
ratings for their foreign debt from leading credit
rating agencies.
Colombia had been a closed economy
for commercial export that radically protected domestic
production. In 1990, under the administration of
former President Cesar Gaviria, the contemporary
economic structure began to take shape. President
Gaviria made a series of economic modifications that
brought the country its highest levels of growth
and most favorable economic conditions in twenty
years. The administration under former President
Samper (1994-1998) was widely considered to be corrupt
and lacking in credibility. Economic growth during
his administration slowed and economic imbalances
widened. The recent deterioration in the economy
has been the result of unsustainable fiscal policies,
external shocks, and a difficult domestic security
situation. The recessionary trend intensified in
late 1998 and real GDP retracted by 4.3% in 1999.
However, current President Pastrana
has taken a number of important steps. After moving
slowly during his first year in office, Pastrana
moved ahead with a serious economically orthodox
recovery package. This included the passage of a
tough budget for 2000 and successful floatation of
the Colombian peso following a series of controlled
devaluations. In mid-September of 2000 the Pastrana
administration submitted a tax reform proposal to
Congress as part of its structural reform efforts
agreed to with the IMF. The tax reform proposal is
integral to the government's larger plan to remove
structural impediments to improve fiscal balances.
Key components of the tax reform submitted include:
raising the financial transactions tax from 0.2%
to 0.3% in 2001; transforming the current sales tax
by incorporating items currently subjected to different
tax rates; lowering income tax from 35% to 32% if
current exemptions are eliminated; and measures to
combat tax evasion and strengthen enforcement of
tax laws.
In late 1999, Colombia received
approval from the IMF for a three-year credit under
the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) to support Colombia?s
economic reform program for 2000-2002. The total
credit was equivalent to $2.7 billion. The Colombian
government?s agreement with the IMF commits it to
maintaining a declining path for inflation and fiscal
deficit while increasing growth. Also in late 1999,
Colombia received notification from the World Bank
that they would receive a $4.2 billion package
that complemented the IMF program. The World Bank
package included backing from the Inter-American
Development Bank (IADB), the Corporacion Andina de
Fomento (CAF), and the Fondo Latinoamericano de Reservas
(FLAR). Specifically the package includes $1.4 billion
from the World Bank, $1.7 billion from IADB,
$600 million from CAF, and $US 500 million from
the FLAR.
Recent economic information has
shown that Colombia?s economy has rebounded from
the recession of 1998?1999. In the first quarter
of 2000 the economy expanded by 2.2%. A larger expansion
of 3.5% occurred in the second quarter over the same
quarter in 1999. The key economic driver behind this
rebound has been an 11.7% expansion relative to the
same quarter last year in the manufacturing industry.
Other sectors showing signs of recovery have been
the agricultural, construction, and financial sectors.
Despite Colombia?s high employment (presently about
20%), consumption continued to grow with retail sales
up 3.5% for July 2000 as compared to July 1999. Despite
the increase in economic activity, consumer prices
remain relatively contained compared to previous
years with annual inflation through 2000 at about
9%. This was below the government's target of 10%
for the year. An historical summary of GDP and inflation
in Colombia is shown in Table 11.
Table 11: GDP and Inflation in
Colombia, 1994-98
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
GDP, trillion (1012)
1994 pesos |
67.5 |
71.0 |
72.5 |
74.5 |
74.9 |
n/a |
GDP Growth, percent |
5.7 |
5.3 |
2.1 |
3.1 |
0.6 |
-4.3 |
Consumer Price Inflation,
percent |
22.6 |
19.5 |
21.6 |
17.7 |
16.7 |
9.2 |
Exchange Rate, pesos/US$ |
826 |
926 |
1,037 |
1,141 |
1,426 |
1,874 |
n/a - not available
Source: Colombian National Planning Department; Latin-Focus (1999 data)
In late 1999, President Pastrana
announced a strategy called 'Plan Colombia', an integrated
strategy to address the most pressing challenges
that Colombia currently faces, such as promoting
the peace process, reviving the economy, combating
the narcotics industry, and strengthening Colombian
society. The plan is a $7.5 billion program,
with the Pastrana administration pledging $4.0 billion
from Colombia's coffers, and calling upon the international
community to provide the balance. The plan is composed
of ten elements that outline proposed strategies
for implementing various components of the plan.
In July 2000, President Clinton signed legislation
providing a $1.3 billion assistance package
to Colombia.
Trade and
Investment
President Andres Pastrana?s administration
has energetically and enthusiastically pursued bilateral
measures and agreements to promote trade and foreign
investment. Activities have included participation
in the periodic Trade and Investment Council meeting
between the United States and the Andean Community
(Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela),
as well as summit meetings between various government
leaders of the European Union and Latin American
and the Caribbean. Also, President Pastrana issued
a directive in 1999 requiring all Colombian public
entities to respect international copyrights. He
has also called for increased competitiveness of
Colombian industry, with the ultimate goal of Colombian
entry into the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). Previous efforts to improve Colombia's attractiveness
to foreign investors included elimination of a hydrocarbon
production tax and changes in its tax laws to reduce
some loopholes and some fees on investment.
During the first half of the 1990s,
Colombia began lowering and simplifying its import
tariffs in order to reform its foreign trade regime
and open up the economy to foreign investment. Colombian
imports are classified into three basic groups: those
freely imported, those requiring approval of a previous
import license, and items that cannot be imported.
All imports must be registered with the Colombian
Foreign Trade Institute (INCOMEX) in a special application
form known as 'Registro de Importacion'. There are
four common external tariff levels in Colombia based
on whether the import is not produced in Colombia
(5% tariff), is produced in Colombia (10 to 15%),
is a finished good (20%), and some exceptions, such
as automobiles which remain at the level of 35 to
40%, and some agricultural products which fall under
a variable import duty system. The countries comprising
the Andean Community have agreed upon this tariff
system for imports from third party countries.
Colombia?s main trading partners
are the United States, followed by the European Union,
Japan, and the Andean Community. Colombian exports
in 1999 to the United States were valued at nearly
$6.3 billion, and Colombian imports from the
United States in 1999 were valued at $3.5 billion.
Colombia was the thirtieth largest market for the
United States in 1999. The primary imports into Colombia
on a cost basis from the United States are machinery
and transportation equipment, and chemicals and related
products. The primary export to the United States
from Colombia is crude oil. Excellent opportunities
for exports to Colombia exist in oil and gas exploration
equipment and services. Another promising prospect
is electrical power systems, provided that the regaining
economic strength of Colombia continues, as does
its rising demand for energy. Colombia's Ministry
of the Environment estimates that the country?s environmental
investment needs will total around $34 billion
during the next decade. The best opportunities include
water and wastewater treatment plants, water and
air monitoring and control equipment, solid waste
hauling and disposal equipment, and environmental
services. Expected future expansion within the coal
mining industry in Colombia will provide opportunities
for additional mining equipment exports, including
shovels, excavators, front loaders and related equipment.
By 2005, Colombia may become a net
importer of oil without increased investment. Currently,
oil exploration investment is only 20% of what Ecopetrol
states that it needs to remain self-sufficient. Ecopetrol?s
1999 exploration budget was about $1.2 billion,
with approximately $430 million raised through
financing and forward sales of oil. Net flow of investment
capital into Colombia for energy projects has fallen
since 1998. Foreign companies have scaled back investment
or left the country, most significantly Shell, Lasmo,
Repsol S.A., and BP-Amoco. Upstream activity is at
a virtual standstill with only 17 exploration wells
drilled in 1998, compared to an average of 70 exploratory
wells annually in the 1980s. In the past 10 years
Colombia has had to infuse at least $8.8 billion
into Ecopetrol, and the company has been criticized
for inefficiency.
Traditionally, Colombia has not
used special incentives to attract foreign investors.
However, the Colombian government has been making
efforts to create an improved climate for investment
to attract long-term foreign capital. Some of these
efforts include: ensuring transfer of new technologies,
modernization of the economy, increasing operating
capacity, and new strategies to peacefully end the
violence in certain regions of the country.
The last four Colombian administrations
have implemented policies that do not discriminate
against foreign investors. The new policies aim to
treat domestic and foreign investors equally. Investment
restrictions in various sectors have been eliminated,
with the exception of those activities that relate
to national security and toxic waste. As a result,
the country has seen a significant increase in foreign
investment since 1991. An historical summary of foreign
investment in Colombia is shown in Table 12.
Table 12: Foreign Investment in
Colombia, 1991-99
Year |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
Total Investment
($ billions) |
311 |
797 |
894 |
1,809 |
2,170 |
2,963 |
4,541 |
4,750 |
4,382 |
Source: Ministerio de Comercio Exterior
Some of the advantages that Colombia
has to offer to foreign investors include duty-free
zones, which were established to promote export of
industrial products; special foreign trade rules;
special tax rules, such as the Tax Refund Certificate
(CERT), which was created so that exporters could
use it to pay income taxes, tariffs and other taxes;
the Paez Law and Quimbee Decrees which promote investment
in regions affected by natural disasters; and finally,
special trade zones comprised of free trade zones
and special economic export zones (SEEZ).
Free trade zones were created in
1958 when the Colombian government established the
Barranquilla Free Industrial and Trading Zone. Free
trade zones are geographic areas that have certain
tax benefits, special regulations for capital investment,
foreign exchange benefits, and procedural incentives.
The types of free trade zones are industrial, commercial,
tourist, and technological. By Law 7 and Decree 2131
in 1991, the Colombian government authorized the
liquidation of the public free trade zone assets
and personnel by July 1994. Five government-owned
zones were given for administration to the private
sector through a concession contract. Authorized
by Law 7, the private sector has also constructed
six more free trade zones.
SEEZs are geographical areas provided
with special conditions that promote the combination
of private capital and potential foreign investment.
Colombia has four SEEZs for exporting purposes. Incentives
to attract investors are customs tax and value-added
tax exemptions on imports for companies that set
up operations in a zone. Colombia is seeking to increase
its export volume by creating favorable conditions
in these zones to attract investors. Operators in
the zone must export a minimum of 80% of their production.
Numerous foreign companies maintain
activity in Colombia. Companies such as Exxon-Mobil,
Chevron, Texaco, BP Amoco, Arco, Conoco, Triton,
Harken, Shell, Elf Aquitaine, Total, Repsol, Lasmo,
PetroCanada, Canadian Petroleum, Petrobras, Teikoku,
Nexen, Inc. (formerly Occidental), Enron and others
continue to play a role in Colombia's oil and gas
industries. U.S.-based Drummond Ltd. plays a major
role in Colombia?s coal mining operations. General
Electric, AES, and the Chilean-based firms of Endesa
S.A. And Gener S.A. are involved in Colombia?s electric
industry.
For
more information, please contact DOE
Country Overview
Project Manager:
Richard Lynch |
|
U.S.
Department of Energy
Office of Fossil Energy
1000 Independence Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20585 USA
Telephone: 1-202-586-7316 |
Click here to send E-mail.
- Return
to Genesis Directory
|